Screener
SPDF vs QQH
Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF vs HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.29% less per year.
- QQH is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPDF is classified as equity, while QQH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QQH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPDF | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $697M |
| Since | 2026 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.21% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.79% |
| Max drawdown | -1.90% | -41.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPDF and QQH
Explore further