Screener
SPEM vs EMHC
State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.16% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than EMHC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPEM is classified as equity, while EMHC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, SPEM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPEM | EMHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $17.3B | $252M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 6.13% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.0% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.6% | +1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.88% | 5.42% |
| Max drawdown | -36.06% | -28.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPEM and EMHC
Explore further