Screener
SPFF vs XRMI
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
- SPFF costs 0.12% less per year.
- SPFF is significantly larger than XRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPFF is classified as fixed income, while XRMI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- SPFF follows a index tracking strategy; XRMI uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, SPFF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPFF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPFF | XRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $148M | $49M |
| Since | 2012 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 6.43% | 12.65% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.6% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.51% | 5.42% |
| Max drawdown | -35.92% | -15.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPFF and XRMI
Explore further