Screener
SPSB vs BWZ
State Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- SPSB costs 0.31% less per year.
- SPSB is significantly larger than BWZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPSB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPSB | BWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.1B | $324M |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.44% | 2.02% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +0.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.2% | +2.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.7% | -2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | -0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.33% | 7.03% |
| Max drawdown | -11.75% | -24.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPSB and BWZ
Explore further