Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

SPTE vs RIFR

SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF

SPTE

SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF

SP Funds

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$141M

RIFR

Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF

Russell Investment Management Limited

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$42M

Key differences

  • SPTE is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SPTE covers north america markets; RIFR covers global.
  • SPTE follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.

Side-by-side comparison

SPTERIFR
Annual cost (TER)0.55%0.59%
Fund size (AUM)$141M$42M
Since20232025
Dividend yield0.81%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaglobal
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+64.9%+16.0%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y21.84%10.46%
Max drawdown-25.54%-6.80%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to SPTE and RIFR