Screener
SPXL vs TZA
Direxion Daily S&P500 Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- SPXL costs 0.15% less per year.
- SPXL is significantly larger than TZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPXL follows a leveraged strategy; TZA uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, SPXL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPXL | TZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.9B | $270M |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 4.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +87.0% | -67.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +55.4% | -46.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.9% | -30.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | -0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.92% | 57.16% |
| Max drawdown | -76.86% | -99.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SPXL and TZA
Explore further