Screener
SPYM vs GNR
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- SPYM costs 0.38% less per year.
- SPYM is significantly larger than GNR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPYM covers north america markets; GNR covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, SPYM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SPYM | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.02% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $137.6B | $4.9B |
| Since | 2005 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.05% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.1% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.4% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.95% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -33.87% | -48.59% |
Similar to SPYM and GNR
Explore further