Screener
STRN vs IWL
SMART Trend 25 ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- STRN follows a active selection strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| STRN | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $2.1B |
| Since | — | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -15.43% | -32.71% |
Similar to STRN and IWL
Explore further