Screener
SUB vs PULS
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF vs PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- SUB costs 0.08% less per year.
- SUB follows a index tracking strategy; PULS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PULS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SUB | PULS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.07% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.1B | $15.7B |
| Since | 2008 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 5.02% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.2% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.2% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.23 | 3.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.01% | 0.42% |
| Max drawdown | -9.46% | -5.85% |
Similar to SUB and PULS
Explore further