Screener
SURE vs XMHQ
AdvisorShares Insider Advantage ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Key differences
- XMHQ costs 0.65% less per year.
- XMHQ is significantly larger than SURE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SURE follows a active selection strategy; XMHQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SURE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XMHQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SURE | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.90% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $5.2B |
| Since | 2011 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.6% | +14.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.8% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.96% | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -35.68% | -36.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SURE and XMHQ
Explore further