Screener
TAN vs PWB
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- PWB costs 0.15% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $1.9B |
| Since | 2008 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +122.2% | +47.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.4% | +34.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | +18.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.88% | 18.57% |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -32.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and PWB
Explore further