Screener
TAN vs MTRA
Invesco Solar ETF vs Invesco International Growth Focus ETF
Key differences
- MTRA costs 0.16% less per year.
- TAN is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TAN follows a index tracking strategy; MTRA uses active selection.
- TAN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TAN | MTRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $142M |
| Since | 2008 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +122.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +0.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.88% | — |
| Max drawdown | -78.53% | -15.77% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TAN and MTRA
Explore further