Screener
TCHP vs FORH
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- TCHP costs 0.62% less per year.
- TCHP is significantly larger than FORH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TCHP is classified as equity, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TCHP follows a index tracking strategy; FORH uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TCHP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TCHP | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $20M |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.1% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.19% | 15.64% |
| Max drawdown | -42.34% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TCHP and FORH
Explore further