Screener
TCHP vs NMAY
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - May
Key differences
- TCHP costs 0.22% less per year.
- TCHP is significantly larger than NMAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TCHP is classified as equity, while NMAY is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TCHP follows a index tracking strategy; NMAY uses structured outcome.
- TCHP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TCHP | NMAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $14M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.1% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.19% | 4.64% |
| Max drawdown | -42.34% | -1.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TCHP and NMAY
Explore further