Screener
TCHP vs NOCT
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
Key differences
- TCHP costs 0.22% less per year.
- TCHP is significantly larger than NOCT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TCHP is classified as equity, while NOCT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TCHP follows a index tracking strategy; NOCT uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, TCHP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TCHP | NOCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $237M |
| Since | 2020 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.1% | +19.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.19% | 7.65% |
| Max drawdown | -42.34% | -16.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TCHP and NOCT
Explore further