Screener
THIR vs XRLX
THOR Index Rotation ETF vs FundX Conservative ETF
Key differences
- THIR costs 0.51% less per year.
- THIR is significantly larger than XRLX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THIR is classified as equity, while XRLX is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- THIR follows a index tracking strategy; XRLX uses active selection.
- XRLX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| THIR | XRLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $51M |
| Since | 2024 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 2.68% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.4% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.59% | 8.13% |
| Max drawdown | -10.05% | -15.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THIR and XRLX
Explore further