Screener
THIR vs XNAV
THOR Index Rotation ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- THIR costs 0.58% less per year.
- THIR is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- THIR is classified as equity, while XNAV is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- THIR follows a index tracking strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| THIR | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $210M | $31M |
| Since | 2024 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.0% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.55% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -10.05% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THIR and XNAV
Explore further