Screener
THNQ vs IBOT
Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Vaneck Robotics ETF
Key differences
- IBOT costs 0.21% less per year.
- THNQ is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, THNQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| THNQ | IBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $322M | $71M |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 0.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +71.0% | +58.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +38.5% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.07% | 22.06% |
| Max drawdown | -50.56% | -25.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to THNQ and IBOT
Explore further