Screener
TMFC vs BIBL
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs Inspire 100 ETF
Key differences
- BIBL costs 0.15% less per year.
- TMFC is significantly larger than BIBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFC | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $436M |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.1% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.7% | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.69% | 15.49% |
| Max drawdown | -33.06% | -36.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFC and BIBL
Explore further