Screener
TMFM vs FDG
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.40% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than TMFM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TMFM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFM | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $387M |
| Since | 2014 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.6% | +37.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -31.75% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFM and FDG
Explore further