Screener
TMFM vs FSGS
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
Both TMFM and FSGS are equity ETFs. TMFM charges 0.85% a year and FSGS 0.61%. The main difference: TMFM follows a active selection strategy; FSGS uses index tracking.
- TMFM follows a active selection strategy; FSGS uses index tracking.
- FSGS costs 0.24% less per year.
- TMFM is much larger than FSGS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, FSGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFM | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $29M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.1% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.1% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.06 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.84% | 15.31% |
| Max drawdown | -31.75% | -43.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.