Screener
TMFX vs BIBL
Motley Fool Next Index ETF vs Inspire 100 ETF
Key differences
- BIBL costs 0.15% less per year.
- BIBL is significantly larger than TMFX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, BIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFX | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $436M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.05% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +13.3% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.79% | 15.49% |
| Max drawdown | -34.30% | -36.12% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFX and BIBL
Explore further