Screener
TRUH vs IHF
Vaneck Healthcare TruSector ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
Key differences
- TRUH costs 0.28% less per year.
- IHF is significantly larger than TRUH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TRUH follows a active selection strategy; IHF uses index tracking.
- IHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRUH | IHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $777M |
| Since | 2026 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +1.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.56% |
| Max drawdown | -4.52% | -35.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TRUH and IHF
Explore further