Screener
TRUH vs IXJ
Vaneck Healthcare TruSector ETF vs iShares Global Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- TRUH costs 0.30% less per year.
- IXJ is significantly larger than TRUH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TRUH follows a active selection strategy; IXJ uses index tracking.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRUH | IXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $0.5M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2026 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.46% |
| Max drawdown | -4.52% | -27.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TRUH and IXJ
Explore further