Screener
TUG vs QTAC
STF Tactical Growth ETF vs Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 1.13% less per year.
- TUG is classified as mixed asset, while QTAC is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TUG follows a active selection strategy; QTAC uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUG | QTAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $54M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.15% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -16.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUG and QTAC
Explore further