Screener
TUGN vs QTAC
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF vs Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 1.13% less per year.
- TUGN follows a option income strategy; QTAC uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUGN | QTAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $54M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 11.46% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.38% | — |
| Max drawdown | -23.45% | -16.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUGN and QTAC
Explore further