Screener
TYLD vs GMOM
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF vs Cambria Global Momentum ETF
Key differences
- TYLD costs 0.42% less per year.
- GMOM is significantly larger than TYLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TYLD is classified as fixed income, while GMOM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TYLD follows a active selection strategy; GMOM uses systematic alpha.
- GMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TYLD | GMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33M | $140M |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.71% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.75% | 13.57% |
| Max drawdown | -1.06% | -19.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TYLD and GMOM
Explore further