Screener
UGA vs FCG
United States Gasoline Fund, LP vs First Trust Natural Gas ETF
Key differences
- FCG costs 0.49% less per year.
- FCG is significantly larger than UGA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UGA is classified as commodity, while FCG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, UGA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UGA | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.08% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $138M | $818M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.04% |
| Asset class | commodity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | — | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +77.7% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +25.9% | +18.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.13% | 26.75% |
| Max drawdown | -75.89% | -85.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UGA and FCG
Explore further