Screener
UNL vs FCG
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP vs First Trust Natural Gas ETF
Key differences
- FCG costs 1.06% less per year.
- FCG is significantly larger than UNL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UNL is classified as commodity, while FCG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, FCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UNL | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.65% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $818M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.04% |
| Asset class | commodity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | — | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -31.0% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -18.7% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.1% | +18.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.54 | 0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.98% | 26.75% |
| Max drawdown | -78.12% | -85.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UNL and FCG
Explore further