Screener
UPV vs FXP
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe vs ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
Key differences
- UPV follows a leveraged strategy; FXP uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, UPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UPV | FXP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $6M |
| Since | 2010 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.14% | 4.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.9% | -4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | -29.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | -17.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | -0.40 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.82% | 38.91% |
| Max drawdown | -67.25% | -94.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UPV and FXP
Explore further