Screener
URA vs GNR
Global X Uranium ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- GNR costs 0.29% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, URA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $4.9B |
| Since | 2010 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.1% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +41.8% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.3% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.70% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -48.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and GNR
Explore further