Screener
GNR vs HAP
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- GNR is significantly larger than HAP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| GNR | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.9B | $316M |
| Since | 2010 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.31% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.9% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.4% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.1% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.66 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.41% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -48.59% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GNR and HAP
Explore further