Screener
URTH vs IGF
iShares MSCI World ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.15% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTH | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.2B | $10.7B |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.17% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -34.01% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTH and IGF
Explore further