Screener
URTY vs RWM
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 vs ProShares Short Russell2000
Key differences
- URTY follows a leveraged strategy; RWM uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, URTY has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URTY | RWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $347M | $143M |
| Since | 2010 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | 3.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +146.2% | -28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.7% | -13.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -3.8% | -6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | -0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 57.65% | 19.17% |
| Max drawdown | -88.09% | -73.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URTY and RWM
Explore further