Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

USE vs FMF

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund vs First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund

USE

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$2M

FMF

First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund

Annual cost

0.98%

Fund size

$260M

Key differences

Both USE and FMF are alternative ETFs. USE charges 0.79% a year and FMF 0.98%. The main difference: USE follows a multi strategy strategy; FMF uses managed futures.

  • USE follows a multi strategy strategy; FMF uses managed futures.
  • USE costs 0.19% less per year.
  • FMF is much larger than USE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, USE has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • FMF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

USEFMF
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.98%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$260M
Since20232013
Dividend yield2.21%5.01%
Asset classalternativealternative
Region
Strategymulti strategymanaged futures
CAGR 1Y+34.1%+19.6%
CAGR 3Y+17.5%+6.5%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.3%
Sharpe 3Y0.600.36
Volatility 1Y31.73%9.76%
Max drawdown-26.24%-16.89%

Similar to USE and FMF