Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

USE vs FAAR

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF

USE

USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$2M

FAAR

First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.98%

Fund size

$176M

Key differences

Both USE and FAAR are alternative ETFs. USE charges 0.79% a year and FAAR 0.98%. The main difference: USE follows a multi strategy strategy; FAAR uses long short.

  • USE follows a multi strategy strategy; FAAR uses long short.
  • USE costs 0.19% less per year.
  • FAAR is much larger than USE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, USE has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

USEFAAR
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.98%
Fund size (AUM)$2M$176M
Since20232016
Dividend yield2.21%9.19%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth america
Strategymulti strategylong short
CAGR 1Y+34.1%+38.6%
CAGR 3Y+17.5%+10.8%
CAGR 5YN/A+8.0%
Sharpe 3Y0.600.64
Volatility 1Y31.73%13.55%
Max drawdown-26.24%-18.03%

Similar to USE and FAAR