Screener
UX vs COPP
Roundhill Uranium ETF vs Sprott Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- COPP costs 0.11% less per year.
- COPP is significantly larger than UX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UX is classified as alternative, while COPP is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- UX follows a multi strategy strategy; COPP uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| UX | COPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $269M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 2.21% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.6% | +99.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.58% | 42.29% |
| Max drawdown | -23.72% | -44.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UX and COPP
Explore further