Screener
UX vs URNM
Roundhill Uranium ETF vs Sprott Uranium Miners Etf
Key differences
- URNM is significantly larger than UX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UX is classified as alternative, while URNM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- UX follows a multi strategy strategy; URNM uses index tracking.
- URNM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UX | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.39% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.2% | +63.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.64% | 52.23% |
| Max drawdown | -23.72% | -50.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UX and URNM
Explore further