Screener
UYM vs SEF
ProShares Ultra Materials vs ProShares Short Financials
Key differences
- UYM follows a leveraged strategy; SEF uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, UYM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UYM | SEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $41M | $18M |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.21% | 3.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.7% | +0.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | -10.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.9% | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | -0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 33.86% | 14.40% |
| Max drawdown | -73.31% | -75.66% |
Similar to UYM and SEF
Explore further