Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

UYM vs SMN

ProShares Ultra Materials vs ProShares UltraShort Materials

UYM

ProShares Ultra Materials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$41M

SMN

ProShares UltraShort Materials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$3M

Key differences

  • UYM is significantly larger than SMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • UYM follows a leveraged strategy; SMN uses inverse.
  • Over the last 3 years, UYM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

UYMSMN
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$41M$3M
Since20072007
Dividend yield1.21%4.58%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1Y+35.7%-31.2%
CAGR 3Y+12.6%-16.8%
CAGR 5Y+3.9%-14.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.41-0.46
Volatility 1Y33.86%34.14%
Max drawdown-73.31%-95.39%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to UYM and SMN