Screener
VAMO vs GMOM
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF vs Cambria Global Momentum ETF
Key differences
- VAMO costs 0.36% less per year.
- VAMO is classified as equity, while GMOM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- VAMO follows a active selection strategy; GMOM uses systematic alpha.
Side-by-side comparison
| VAMO | GMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $83M | $140M |
| Since | 2015 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.62% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.1% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +13.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.5% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.23% | 13.59% |
| Max drawdown | -41.83% | -19.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VAMO and GMOM
Explore further