Screener
VCLN vs ACES
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF vs ALPS Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ACES is significantly larger than VCLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VCLN follows a active selection strategy; ACES uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VCLN | ACES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $127M |
| Since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 0.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.7% | +55.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | -2.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.00% | 32.30% |
| Max drawdown | -45.66% | -79.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VCLN and ACES
Explore further