Screener
VCLN vs ICLN
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.20% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than VCLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VCLN follows a active selection strategy; ICLN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VCLN | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.9% | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.11% | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -45.66% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VCLN and ICLN
Explore further