Screener
VCLN vs FRNW
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF vs Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- FRNW costs 0.20% less per year.
- FRNW is significantly larger than VCLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VCLN follows a active selection strategy; FRNW uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VCLN | FRNW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $141M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.9% | +84.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +9.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.11% | 25.62% |
| Max drawdown | -45.66% | -59.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VCLN and FRNW
Explore further