Screener
VCLN vs CTEC
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF vs Global X ClimateTech ETF
Key differences
- CTEC costs 0.09% less per year.
- CTEC is significantly larger than VCLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VCLN follows a active selection strategy; CTEC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VCLN | CTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $30M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 0.59% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.7% | +124.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.00% | 34.99% |
| Max drawdown | -45.66% | -81.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VCLN and CTEC
Explore further