Screener
VCLN vs SMOG
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF vs VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Key differences
- VCLN costs 0.05% less per year.
- SMOG is significantly larger than VCLN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VCLN follows a active selection strategy; SMOG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SMOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VCLN | SMOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $152M |
| Since | 2021 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.61% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.9% | +43.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.11% | 20.30% |
| Max drawdown | -45.66% | -51.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VCLN and SMOG
Explore further