Screener
VERS vs FDRS
ProShares Metaverse ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.09% less per year.
- FDRS is significantly larger than VERS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VERS is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- VERS follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| VERS | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $77M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.30% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +33.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.51% | — |
| Max drawdown | -42.13% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VERS and FDRS
Explore further