Screener
VERS vs IBLC
ProShares Metaverse ETF vs iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
Key differences
- IBLC costs 0.11% less per year.
- IBLC is significantly larger than VERS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- VERS is classified as equity, while IBLC is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, IBLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VERS | IBLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $83M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.30% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +66.9% | +76.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +33.4% | +51.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.51% | 55.29% |
| Max drawdown | -42.13% | -62.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VERS and IBLC
Explore further