Screener
VNAM vs AAXJ
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both VNAM and AAXJ are equity ETFs. VNAM charges 0.51% a year and AAXJ 0.72%. The main difference: VNAM covers emerging markets; AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- VNAM covers emerging markets; AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- VNAM costs 0.21% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than VNAM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VNAM | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.51% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $4.0B |
| Since | 2021 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.6% | +43.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.86% | 21.53% |
| Max drawdown | -52.84% | -44.52% |
Similar to VNAM and AAXJ
Explore further