Screener
VNAM vs IPAC
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both VNAM and IPAC are equity ETFs. VNAM charges 0.51% a year and IPAC 0.09%. The main difference: VNAM covers emerging markets; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- VNAM covers emerging markets; IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- IPAC costs 0.42% less per year.
- IPAC is much larger than VNAM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IPAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| VNAM | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.51% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $2.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 3.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.6% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.2% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.86% | 16.74% |
| Max drawdown | -52.84% | -31.00% |
Similar to VNAM and IPAC
Explore further